search faculty.ai
AI ETHICS & SAFETY
Our approach to safe and ethical AI
We believe responsible AI is a force for good.
How we apply it will determine the world in which we live.
At Faculty, we design, build and implement AI systems that
help our customers make better decisions. We only deploy AI
that is unbiased, robust, private, explainable and ethical.
AI can tackle real business
challenges – but it can
raise problems, too.
AI systems deployed without sufficient safety and ethical
considerations cause problems: bias and discrimination,
invasions of privacy, and unexplainable outcomes.
These threats jeopardise business performance and reputation.
We’ve been trusted to tackle some of society’s biggest challenges
with AI – from helping police crackdown on organised crime
to supporting the NHS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Where the
wrong decision impacts society, AI ethics and safety is essential.
Every AI system we deploy has been designed and built to our
strict ethical principles and high standards of AI safety – reinforced
by a dedicated R&D team and leading academic research.
AI Safety
We deploy AI systems supported by our four pillars of AI Safety:
Fair
AI can help make organisations make fairer decisions.
We have checks in place to guarantee our technology processes information fairly across sensitive groups so discriminatory models never make it to production.
Robust
AI that helps make critical decisions must be secure and trustworthy.
Our technology preemptively detects data drifts and anomalies. Performance is continuously validated with in-built monitoring.
Explainable
Explainable AI means you will always understand why it produced that prediction.
With intuitive dashboards, we provide transparency even in the most complex predictions – enabling more informed decisions.
Private
We always meet the standards of industry data ethics frameworks.
We always uphold privacy and data rights, following rigorous practices of data security. We pseudonymise private and sensitive datasets and ensure data is handled securely.
Our approach to building ethical, safe AI systems
We ensure AI Safety is embedded within every stage of the development lifecycle.
Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainability
A mathematically justified method for incorporating causality into Shapley values, overcoming a fundamental limitation of current day explainability. Published in NeurIPS.
Shapley explainability on the data manifold
A demonstration of how to calculate Shapley values, the most commonly used method to explain black-box models, without making the flawed assumption that features in the data are independent, developing the first general, scalable approach to correctly calculating Shapley values. Published in ICLR.
Human-interpretable model explainability on high-dimensional data
A framework for explaining black-box models in terms of the high-level features (e.g. people’s characteristics, objects) that humans care about, rather than the low-level features (e.g. pixels) that the models use.
Explainability for fair machine learning
The first demonstration of directly explaining bias in AI models. Submitted.
Learning to Noise: Application-Agnostic Data Sharing with Local Differential Privacy
A method to share high-dimensional data with the powerful guarantees of Local Differential Privacy. Submitted.
Our perspective on AI Safety & ethics
Safety from the start: Our journey to building some of the world’s best tooling to make AI safe
Parenting autonomous agents for AI Safety
What is AI Safety?
AI Safety: correcting 200,000 years of human error
AI Safety: The Business Case For Robustness
The business case for AI safety: explainability
Explainable AI: Data science needs a common language for explainability
NeurIPS: New techniques for building more explainable AI
New principles for AI: Generalising AI models
AI Safety in the press
Faculty brings on artificial intelligence pioneer Professor Stuart Russell as advisor for AI Safety
Jaan Tallinn invests in Faculty’s AI Safety research programme
Marc Warner sets out views on AI regulation
